spacer.png, 0 kB
Home arrow Short-Sales
Click to Call!
Click this Button, put in your phone number, and be connected with us instantly!

click-text.png 

Main Menu
Login Form
Display Blog Preview
  • Blog Category 1 Goodbye Downpayment Assistance Patrick Rabelo
    30 Jul 08

    Posted July 30, 2008

    What The New Housing Law Means For You

    Bankrate.com--July 30, 2008

    After reading the above article, I have mixed feelings about the new housing law that was signed by President George W. Bush.

    In concept, I understand that the FED had to take action to help stabilize the faltering housing market.  I also understand the need to help stabilize Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  Here is where the FED and I part ways.

    One of the provisions of the new housing bill mandates that downpayment gifts offered through non-profit organizations like the Nehemiah program will no longer be available to firt-time homebuyers as of October 2008. 

    Instead, a first-time homebuyer's tax credit of $7,500 will be offered and the first-time homebuyer will have 15 years to repay the credit.  Here is where I do not understand the logic of the FED.

    Currently, most of the first-time homebuyers I assist do not have a problem paying the montly mortgage.  Most of the first-time homebuyers I work with report they cannot come up with the downpayment.  Now, the majority of the purchasers of todays market are either first-time homebuyers or investors.  Investors have vast sources of cash to work with and first-time homebuyers rely on financing that is becomming more stringent relative to lending requirements. Increased downpayments are limiting the buyers pool of first-time homebuyers. My question is: how is removing seller-funded down-payment assistance going to help stimulate sales of a stagnate resale market?

    More importantly, new home starts are a critical component to jump starting the housing market.  Based on the above article, 33% of one builder's clients utilized down-payment assistance! How can eliminating 33 out of 100 sales be considered market stimulation? Why would a builder want to produce new homes when they can not sell the units fast enough? What are your thoughts?  Please share your comments below. 

    Comments (0)Add Comment

    Write comment
    quote
    bold
    italicize
    underline
    strike
    url
    image
    quote
    quote
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley

    busy
    Read more
  • Blog Category 1 Market Stabilization or Bailout? Patrick Rabelo
    25 Jul 08

    Posted July 25, 2008

    Housing Bill Clears Final Senate Hurdle

    Wall Street Journal Article--July 25, 2008

    It is apparent that the Housing Bill designed to curb the foreclosure crisis in America will become law.  Some Americans believe this is nothing more than a government bailout that rewards irresponsible lenders and borrowers. 

    According to the above Wall Street Journal Article, "lawmakers have described the bill as the 'most important piece of housing legislation in a generation' intended to stabilize the still faltering housing market".  What are your thoughts?  Please share your comments below. 

    Comments (0)Add Comment

    Write comment
    quote
    bold
    italicize
    underline
    strike
    url
    image
    quote
    quote
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley

    busy
    Read more
  • Blog Category 1 Vulture Investors or Savvy Buyers? Patrick Rabelo
    07 Jul 08

    Posted July 7, 2008

    Vulture Real Estate Investors Swoop In

    CNN.Com July 5, 2008

    Is it a good time to buy? This is the question of much debate and depending on who you ask, you will receive varied answers.  It really comes down to risk and your motivation.

    Personally, I am waiting for the prices to come down further because I have access to cash and do not have to factor interest rates going up as part of the decision making process.

    On the other hand, if there are properties that I want to finance, I would be seriously considering a purchase because prices have come down to a point where "cash flowing" a property for a postive return is very possible and I would not want to erode the potential "cash flow" profit because of increased interest payments.

    As the attached article illustrates, many investors are swooping in and going directly to the bank and securing strings of properties at steep discounts.  This methodology works well if you are buying a bank's  inventory wholesale and have a large bankroll of cash backing you. If you are like most people, it is probable that you will need financing, therefore, interest rates are going to weigh in the buying decision. What are your thoughts? Are bargain hunter investors helping or hurting the Real Estate market's recovery? Please share your comments below.

     

    Comments (0)Add Comment

    Write comment
    quote
    bold
    italicize
    underline
    strike
    url
    image
    quote
    quote
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley
    Smiley

    busy
    Read more
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
patrick_rabelo_v2.15_alt.jpg

Short-Sales

What is a Short-Sale?

A short-sale is the sale of a house in which the proceeds fall short of what the owner still owes on the mortgage. Many lenders will agree to accept the proceeds of a short sale and forgive the rest of what is owed on the mortgage when the owner cannot make the mortgage payments. By accepting a short sale, the lender can avoid a lengthy and costly foreclosure, and the owner is able to pay off the loan for less than what he owes.

Are There Tax Consequences for the Seller?

Possibly.  There are several factors involved that determine if a short-sale will result in a taxable event for the Seller.  The most basic is whether the debt obligation was recourse or non-recourse.

If the loan obligation was recourse debt, a Seller could be held personally liable for its payment.  If the loan obligation is non-recourse, the lender can look only to the property for repayment.  The best course of action to follow is to seek the advice of an Attorney and/or Certified Public Accountant.

Should a Seller Consult a Realtor?

The Pre-Foreclosure process can be very complex if a Seller is not familiar with all the laws involved.  A Realtor is a professional that can help reduce the learning curve, thus translating the time savings into loss mitigation.  Remember, once the foreclosure process has started a Seller has approximately 110 days to prevent a Trustee Sale.  Is saving a commission worth the risk of not having a Real Estate professional as a guide?

Should a Buyer Consult a Realtor?

If you are a thinking of Buying a short-sale as an owner occupied primary residence it is important to involve someone that understands the Pre-Foreclosure process well enough to navigate through the numerous hurdles short-sales entail. Since the Listing Firm  is the one who pays the Buying Firm's commision, it would make the best business sense to have a Real Estate Professional on your side. Click Here to see a list of Short-Sales currently available.

Should an Investor Consult a Realtor?

If you are a seasoned investor and have succesfully negotiated a few deals, you probably are aware of all the California Civil Codes that relate to short-sales and the proper disclosures one needs to present a short-sale Seller. 

If you are new to investing, then, you're timing could not be more perfect. The following update from the California Association of Realtors is something you need to be aware of.

According to the California Association of Realtors, The California Supreme Court has denied review of a Court of Appeal decision that the bond requirement under the home equity sales contracts law is unconstitutional and unenforceable. Schweitzer v. Westminster Investments (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1195, review denied March 26, 2008. Under Schweitzer, buyers' agents may represent investors without obtaining the surety bond required under the home equity sales contracts law. Buyers and their agents must nevertheless comply with the other requirements of the home equity sales contracts law.

Prior to this court case, a Realtor could not represent a Home Equity Purchaser without a surety bond, which was a violation of California Civil Code 1695.17.

As a result of the Schweitzer case, the courts have determined that the bond requirement is unconstitutionally vaque under the due process clause and may not be enforced.

What does this mean for Investors? For investors who are not experienced in purchasing short-sales, it means an Investor can now use a Realtor to represent them.  Click Here to see a list of Short-Sales currently available.

If you would like to contact me for more information, please This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it   to text message me for an appointment.

spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
Copyright © 2007 - Rabelo Group spacer.png, 0 kB